Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH] pidmap: Use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate page (was: Re: [ 00/54] 3.0.32-stable review) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Sat, 19 May 2012 22:01:47 -0400 |
| |
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 21:20 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Well, I set up a box to run ktest randconfigs and some other checks. > > Right now it's running on the 3.2.18-rc release. If I can sneak away > > from the misses, I may be able to kick off tests against these releases > > too. But I only have one box dedicated for this, so everything needs to > > be processed serially. > > No rush, do it on Monday if needed. Thanks for testing, I appreciate > it.
Ran 18 tests against 3.0.32-rc, 2 failed (16 passed!). One failed by a lock up (still looking into it) and the other is this one:
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 4799.59 BogoMIPS (lpj=2399799) pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002 Modules linked in: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.1.0-rc9-test+ #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81435b3e>] __schedule_bug+0x57/0x5b [<ffffffff8143c44f>] __schedule+0x90/0x672 [<ffffffff810636dd>] ? kzalloc.constprop.2+0x24/0x26 [<ffffffff810460d1>] __cond_resched+0x23/0x2f [<ffffffff8143ca83>] _cond_resched+0x14/0x1d^M [<ffffffff810f7cd3>] slab_pre_alloc_hook.isra.52+0x28/0x2c [<ffffffff810f8b1a>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x29/0xbd [<ffffffff810636dd>] kzalloc.constprop.2+0x24/0x26 [<ffffffff81b7a434>] pidmap_init+0x81/0xc0 [<ffffffff81b61b03>] start_kernel+0x330/0x3c2 [<ffffffff81b612c4>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3 [<ffffffff81b61140>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140 [<ffffffff81b613ca>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x102/0x111 Security Framework initialized
Had CONFIG_SLUB, IRQ_FORCED_THREADING and voluntary preempt enabled. Seems the might_resched() check from might_sleep_if() in pre_alloc_hook() caused a schedule in early boot (pidmap_init). Not sure why it scheduled that early, perhaps a threaded interrupt was added? I haven't been able to reproduce it again.
Perhaps we should not be using GFP_KERNEL when allocating memory for pidmap_init()? As we have preemption disabled at this point, we should be using GFP_ATOMIC. Also add a BUG_ON if the page fails to get allocated.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This patch is against 3.4-rc2 (just happened to be a kernel checkout I had).
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c index 9f08dfa..32dab20 100644 --- a/kernel/pid.c +++ b/kernel/pid.c @@ -563,7 +563,9 @@ void __init pidmap_init(void) PIDS_PER_CPU_MIN * num_possible_cpus()); pr_info("pid_max: default: %u minimum: %u\n", pid_max, pid_max_min); - init_pid_ns.pidmap[0].page = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); + /* Preemption is still disabled at this point */ + init_pid_ns.pidmap[0].page = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC); + BUG_ON(!init_pid_ns.pidmap[0].page); /* Reserve PID 0. We never call free_pidmap(0) */ set_bit(0, init_pid_ns.pidmap[0].page); atomic_dec(&init_pid_ns.pidmap[0].nr_free);
| |