lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch] blkcg: change a spin_lock() to spin_lock_irq()
Smatch complains that we re-enable IRQs twice.  It looks like we forgot
to disable them here on the spin_trylock() failure path. This was added
in 9f13ef678e "blkcg: use double locking instead of RCU for blkg
synchronization".

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 74a76a8..bf4b76e 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ static int blkiocg_pre_destroy(struct cgroup *cgroup)
} else {
spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
cpu_relax();
- spin_lock(&blkcg->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
}
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-29 20:53    [W:1.603 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site