Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:01:19 +0100 | Subject | Tracking regressions for next release(s) | From | Maciej Rutecki <> |
| |
Hi
For a long time (dealing with colleagues) we tracking regressions in stable RC versions of the kernel. Because 3.3 is out, and it is time thinking about tracking regressions for next release. I believe that we need to do some summary and decide on further action.
I am interested in the opinion of the developers, testers, and everyone involved in the development of the kernel, if they thing that tracking regressions and monitoring the quality makes sense, especially since I met several times (put it mildly) dislike of such work and the bugs are repaired relatively slowly. Perhaps someone has comments or proposals for change (in the way of work or me).
I care about the opinion, because without the acceptance of the community work does not make sense. I also do not insist, because I'll have more time for other tasks such as testing.
Regards -- Maciej Rutecki http://www.mrutecki.pl
| |