[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 4/5] page_alloc: Make movablecore_map has higher priority
On 2012-12-9 16:10, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Liu, Wu,
> On 12/06/2012 10:26 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2012-12-6 9:26, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2012 11:43 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>> If we make "movablecore_map" take precedence over "movablecore/kernelcore",
>>>> the logic could be simplified. I think it's not so attractive to support
>>>> both "movablecore_map" and "movablecore/kernelcore" at the same time.
> Thanks for the advice of removing movablecore/kernelcore. But since we
> didn't plan to do this in the beginning, and movablecore/kernelcore are
> more user friendly, I think for now, I'll handle DMA and low memory address problems as you mentioned, and just keep movablecore/kernelcore
> in the next version. :)
Hi Tang,
I mean we could ignore kernelcore/movablecore if user specifies
both movablecore_map and kernelcore/movablecore in the kernel command
line. I'm not suggesting to get rid of kernelcore/movablecore:)

> And about the SRAT, I think it is necessary to many users. I think we
> should provide both interfaces. I may give a try in the next version.
> Thanks. :)
> .

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-10 03:21    [W:0.100 / U:3.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site