lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups
Am 07.12.2012 03:51, schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800
>> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>>> Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll
>>> redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not
>>> delayed until 3.9?
>>
>> It would be better to do things in the other order.
>>
>> a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause
>> functional changes. Jan's patches are functional changes which
>> require more thought and testing and possible fixups.
>
> Fine by me. Jan?

No problem.

I agree with Andrew, that patches 9 to 14 could use indeed some
more eyeballs.

Patches 1 to 8 are more straight-forward, and I would consider
these ready. However, they are also those, where I probably won't
have any trouble rebasing them on top of your changes.


Anyway. Until now I always thought my patches will end up in the
queue of some maintainer, so that I don't have to bother about
_when_ posting my patches. Therefore: when should I repost a
version rebased on top of Joe's changes?

(If I'd get some opinions on 9 to 14 until then, all the better.)

Regards
Jan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-07 13:41    [W:0.115 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site