lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups
From
Date
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800
> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll
> > redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not
> > delayed until 3.9?
>
> It would be better to do things in the other order.
>
> a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause
> functional changes. Jan's patches are functional changes which
> require more thought and testing and possible fixups.

Fine by me. Jan?

Jan's patches also correct garbled output with the relatively
infrequent use of printk with only a newline like printk("\n");

$ git grep -E "\b(printk|pr_cont)\s*\(\s*\"\\\\n\""|wc -l
890

I think that's not too serious a dmesg problem for now.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-07 04:21    [W:0.120 / U:2.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site