Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:51:10 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800 > Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll > > redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not > > delayed until 3.9? > > It would be better to do things in the other order. > > a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause > functional changes. Jan's patches are functional changes which > require more thought and testing and possible fixups.
Fine by me. Jan?
Jan's patches also correct garbled output with the relatively infrequent use of printk with only a newline like printk("\n");
$ git grep -E "\b(printk|pr_cont)\s*\(\s*\"\\\\n\""|wc -l 890
I think that's not too serious a dmesg problem for now.
| |