Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:58:02 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: do not sleep in balance_pgdat if there's no i/o congestion |
| |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:12:08 +0000 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:17:07AM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > > On a 4GB RAM machine, where Normal zone is much smaller than > > DMA32 zone, the Normal zone gets fragmented in time. This requires > > relatively more pressure in balance_pgdat to get the zone above the > > required watermark. Unfortunately, the congestion_wait() call in there > > slows it down for a completely wrong reason, expecting that there's > > a lot of writeback/swapout, even when there's none (much more common). > > After a few days, when fragmentation progresses, this flawed logic > > translates to a very high CPU iowait times, even though there's no > > I/O congestion at all. If THP is enabled, the problem occurs sooner, > > but I was able to see it even on !THP kernels, just by giving it a bit > > more time to occur. > > > > The proper way to deal with this is to not wait, unless there's > > congestion. Thanks to Mel Gorman, we already have the function that > > perfectly fits the job. The patch was tested on a machine which > > nicely revealed the problem after only 1 day of uptime, and it's been > > working great. > > --- > > mm/vmscan.c | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de
There seems to be some complexity/duplication here between the new unbalanced_zone() and pgdat_balanced().
Can we modify pgdat_balanced() so that it also handles order=0, then do
- if (!unbalanced_zone || (order && pgdat_balanced(pgdat, balanced, *classzone_idx))) + if (!pgdat_balanced(...))
?
| |