Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:40:38 +0530 (IST) | From | P J P <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] exec: do not leave bprm->interp on stack |
| |
Hello Kees, Al,
+-- On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Kees Cook wrote --+ | If we change binfmt_script to not make a recursive call, then we still | need to keep the interp change somewhere off the stack. I still think | my patchset is the least bad. | | Al, do you have something else in mind?
Guys, are there any updates further?
Al, what's your take on the *rare* extra call to request_module?
Thank you. -- Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Security Response Team DB7A 84C5 D3F9 7CD1 B5EB C939 D048 7860 3655 602B
| |