lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] exec: do not leave bprm->interp on stack
From
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:10 AM, P J P <ppandit@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Kees, Al,
>
> +-- On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Kees Cook wrote --+
> | If we change binfmt_script to not make a recursive call, then we still
> | need to keep the interp change somewhere off the stack. I still think
> | my patchset is the least bad.
> |
> | Al, do you have something else in mind?
>
> Guys, are there any updates further?
>
> Al, what's your take on the *rare* extra call to request_module?

Without any other feedback, I'd like to use my minimal allocation
patch, since it fixes the problem and doesn't change any of the
semantics of how/when loading happens.

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-12 23:21    [W:0.387 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site