lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:12:17AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> - is it worth Red Hat doing - that's up to Red Hat's business managers
>
> - is it worth merging into the kernel - that's not
>
> The capability bit is small and clean the rest of it is beginning to look
> far too ugly for upstream right now. Not to say it might not end up small
> and clean in the end.

I absolutely agree - the code has to be good enough to be accepted
upstream and I've no objection to being told that better implementations
must be produced. I do object to being told that there's no point in
trying to find an acceptable implementation.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-06 15:04    [W:0.234 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site