Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:17:44 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support |
| |
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:12:17AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > - is it worth Red Hat doing - that's up to Red Hat's business managers > > - is it worth merging into the kernel - that's not > > The capability bit is small and clean the rest of it is beginning to look > far too ugly for upstream right now. Not to say it might not end up small > and clean in the end.
I absolutely agree - the code has to be good enough to be accepted upstream and I've no objection to being told that better implementations must be produced. I do object to being told that there's no point in trying to find an acceptable implementation.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |