lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:36:32PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> For automated installs you don't have to satisfy me. Feel free to
> deliver a lousy solution to your users. Just don't use your arbitrary
> design decisions to justify your kernel patches.

My kernel patches are justified by genuine user requirements. If you
don't feel that there's any requirement for the kernel to satisfy the
people who use it, you're free to ignore those patches.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-06 05:23    [W:0.152 / U:1.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site