lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare()
From
On 22 November 2012 02:13, Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com> wrote:
> HAVE_CLK logically wraps HAVE_CLK_PREPARE. There is no point in
> selecting HAVE_CLK_PREPARE without HAVE_CLK.
>
> Looking through the code I see that this used to be the case. Commit
> 93abe8e "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" moved the
> clk_(un)prepare declarations outside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. That
> commit was authored by you. Can you elaborate on why that aspect of the
> patch was needed?

Haha... Caught red handed :(

Before this commit, nothing was enclosed within CONFIG_HAVE_CLK and
this patch only introduced it. I am not really sure, why i kept
prepare/unprepare
out of it though :(

Maybe because some platform at that time is using it directly, without
CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. Not sure.

--
viresh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-23 04:21    [W:0.068 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site