lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> writes:

> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:03:02PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> I don't want my system p0wned in the first place and I don't want to run
>> windows. Why should I trust Microsoft's signing key?
>
> There's no reason to. Systems that don't trust Microsoft's signing key
> have no reason to be concerned about Microsoft revocation.
> Unfortunately, that's not the only set of people we have to worry
> about.

No reason to? How can I configure an off the shelf system originally
sold with windows 8 installed to boot in UEFI secure boot mode using
shim without trusting Microsoft's key?

Eric


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-03 02:21    [W:1.008 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site