Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:47:02 -0700 | Subject | Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support |
| |
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:03:02PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> I don't want my system p0wned in the first place and I don't want to run >> windows. Why should I trust Microsoft's signing key? > > There's no reason to. Systems that don't trust Microsoft's signing key > have no reason to be concerned about Microsoft revocation. > Unfortunately, that's not the only set of people we have to worry > about.
No reason to? How can I configure an off the shelf system originally sold with windows 8 installed to boot in UEFI secure boot mode using shim without trusting Microsoft's key?
Eric
| |