lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: scsi target, likely GPL violation
> >      1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case
> > we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or
> > 2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to
> > prevail on RTS to accept.
> >
> > Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this
> > nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.
>
> That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the
> facts. It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference
> for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out.

So how can you demand a public apology for libel or instant first hand
proof and now claim you just wanted moderation ? It's not hard to see why
your position was misinterpreted ?

Alan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-11 20:01    [W:0.047 / U:0.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site