Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation | From | James Bottomley <> | Date | Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:22:37 +0000 |
| |
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 10:15 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > James wrote: > >> [I'd like to see] a genuine public apology for the libel... > >> Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of > this > >> nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.
Hey that's a complete misrepresentation. I expressed no such opinion in the email.
What I said was:
> I would really appreciate it if the next email I see from you on this > subject is either > > 1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case > we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or > 2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to > prevail on RTS to accept. > > Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this > nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.
That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the facts. It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out.
James
| |