Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/33] AutoNUMA27 | Date | Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:14:44 -0700 |
| |
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 01:50:42 +0200 > Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote: > >> This is a new AutoNUMA27 release for Linux v3.6. > > Peter's numa/sched patches have been in -next for a week.
Did they pass review? I have some doubts.
The last time I looked it also broke numactl.
> Guys, what's the plan here?
Since they are both performance features their ultimate benefit is how much faster they make things (and how seldom they make things slower)
IMHO needs a performance shot-out. Run both on the same 10 workloads and see who wins. Just a lot of of work. Any volunteers?
For a change like this I think less regression is actually more important than the highest peak numbers.
-Andi
-- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
| |