Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:49:19 +0000 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support |
| |
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:50 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:39:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:17:43 +0000 > > Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > > > By booting a signed kernel, not turning on swap and writing directly to > > > the swap partition. > > > > Ok so the actual problem is that you are signing kernels that allow the > > user to skip the S4 resume check ? > > What S4 resume check?
One you would add .. but no I'm wrong there - its a problem at the suspend point so you do need a signature for it. Oh well yet another reason it's nto useful.
Alan
| |