Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:45:20 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support |
| |
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:49:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:50 +0000 > Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > > What S4 resume check? > > One you would add .. but no I'm wrong there - its a problem at the > suspend point so you do need a signature for it. Oh well yet another > reason it's nto useful.
Right. Hence the idea of a protected keystore at boot time. We can do this securely, but it does involve writing code.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |