lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:49:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:50 +0000
> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > What S4 resume check?
>
> One you would add .. but no I'm wrong there - its a problem at the
> suspend point so you do need a signature for it. Oh well yet another
> reason it's nto useful.

Right. Hence the idea of a protected keystore at boot time. We can do
this securely, but it does involve writing code.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-31 19:21    [W:0.144 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site