Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | [PATCH] kvm, svm: Cleanup error statements | Date | Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:20:04 +0200 |
| |
Use __func__ instead of the function name in svm_hardware_enable since those things tend to get out of sync. This also slims down printk line length in conjunction with using pr_err.
No functionality change.
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> --- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c index d017df3899ef..e93908fabf46 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -630,15 +630,12 @@ static int svm_hardware_enable(void *garbage) return -EBUSY; if (!has_svm()) { - printk(KERN_ERR "svm_hardware_enable: err EOPNOTSUPP on %d\n", - me); + pr_err("%s: err EOPNOTSUPP on %d\n", __func__, me); return -EINVAL; } sd = per_cpu(svm_data, me); - if (!sd) { - printk(KERN_ERR "svm_hardware_enable: svm_data is NULL on %d\n", - me); + pr_err("%s: svm_data is NULL on %d\n", __func__, me); return -EINVAL; } -- 1.8.0.rc2
| |