lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] kvm, svm: Cleanup error statements
Date
Use __func__ instead of the function name in svm_hardware_enable since
those things tend to get out of sync. This also slims down printk line
length in conjunction with using pr_err.

No functionality change.

Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index d017df3899ef..e93908fabf46 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -630,15 +630,12 @@ static int svm_hardware_enable(void *garbage)
return -EBUSY;

if (!has_svm()) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "svm_hardware_enable: err EOPNOTSUPP on %d\n",
- me);
+ pr_err("%s: err EOPNOTSUPP on %d\n", __func__, me);
return -EINVAL;
}
sd = per_cpu(svm_data, me);
-
if (!sd) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "svm_hardware_enable: svm_data is NULL on %d\n",
- me);
+ pr_err("%s: svm_data is NULL on %d\n", __func__, me);
return -EINVAL;
}

--
1.8.0.rc2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-20 21:01    [W:0.030 / U:0.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site