Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:28:15 +0200 | From | Daniel Kiper <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86/xen: Register resources required by kexec-tools |
| |
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:40:01AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 28.09.12 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:06:32PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > >> + for (i = 0; i < cpus; ++i) { > > > > Any specific reason for using '++i' instead of 'i++' ? > > For people occasionally also writing C++ code this is the > canonical form.
Heh... I have not written any C++ code since the end of my C++ course at my university (~18 years). I am just prefer '++i' instead of 'i++'. That is it.
Daniel
| |