lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/11] x86/xen: Register resources required by kexec-tools
    >>> On 28.09.12 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
    > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:06:32PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
    >> + for (i = 0; i < cpus; ++i) {
    >
    > Any specific reason for using '++i' instead of 'i++' ?

    For people occasionally also writing C++ code this is the
    canonical form.

    Jan



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-10-01 12:21    [W:5.216 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site