Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:02:26 -0700 | From | David Brown <> | Subject | of_iomap() matched with plan iounmap() |
| |
The SPARC target contains of_ioremap() and of_iounmap(), which various drivers use (generally inside of CONFIG_SBUS).
include/linux/of_address.h contains a definition for of_iomap(), but not corresponding unmap call. Code using this calls the regular iounmap().
Is it safe to assume that of_iomap() will always be based on ioremap() and therefore it is safe to use iounmap(), or would it be better to define another name for drivers to use as the inverse of of_iomap(). I'm not sure what to call it, since of_iounmap() is already taken by SPARC.
Thanks, David
-- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
| |