Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:11:37 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: hide subsystem from the populace | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> wrote: > Linus Walleij wrote at Monday, November 07, 2011 7:15 AM:
>> if PINCTRL >> >> +menu "Pin controllers" >> + depends on PINCTRL >> + >> config PINMUX >> bool "Support pinmux controllers" >> help > > But shouldn't PINMUX and PINMUX_${soc} also have their help text removed; > it seems like if a SoC selects PINCTRL, it would also select PINMUX if > appropriate, and the relevant PINMUX_${soc} too?
Yep, you're absolutely right, let's cut the crap.
> I assume there are also patches for arch/arm/mach-${foo}/Kconfig somewhere > to select PINCTRL when appropriate; they didn't show up in my inbox, but > I haven't checked my sub-folders yet, so perhaps they're already there.
The U300 one is already in arch/arm/mach-u300/Kconfig
The SirfPrimaII will be part of that platform (still out-of-tree). They have to start somewhere ... those guys need pinmux to even get the UART working.
Thanks, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |