Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:34:03 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/8] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early |
| |
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:18:03 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote: > >>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> > >>> > >>> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before stop_machine() > >>> has been set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if > >>> there's only one CPU online. > >> Not that you need this, since it's >90% Tejun's code now, but: > >> > >> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> > > hey, extra review is always useful. > > > > Jeremy, Tejun, what's the expected merge path of these changes? > > Andrew has already picked up the stop_machine patch, I think. But it's > pretty settled now, so it shouldn't cause any problem if it gets via > multiple paths. > > What about the jump-label stuff? Has that been going via tip.git in the > past, or by some other path?
If it has Jason's and PeterZ's ack then it can go via any other tree in this cycle - we are not carrying jump label patches right now.
But those acks are very much desired.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |