Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:44:00 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/8] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early |
| |
On 10/12/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote: > >> On 10/10/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:18:03 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote: >>>>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> >>>>> >>>>> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before stop_machine() >>>>> has been set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if >>>>> there's only one CPU online. >>>> Not that you need this, since it's >90% Tejun's code now, but: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> >>> hey, extra review is always useful. >>> >>> Jeremy, Tejun, what's the expected merge path of these changes? >> Andrew has already picked up the stop_machine patch, I think. But it's >> pretty settled now, so it shouldn't cause any problem if it gets via >> multiple paths. >> >> What about the jump-label stuff? Has that been going via tip.git in the >> past, or by some other path? > If it has Jason's and PeterZ's ack then it can go via any other tree > in this cycle - we are not carrying jump label patches right now. > > But those acks are very much desired.
Jason has already Acked it, but then pointed out a couple of problems to address.
I'll add PeterZ to the next repost.
J
| |