lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:49:38PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> Device nodes in DT can associate themselves with one or more
> regulators/supply by providing a list of phandles (to regulator nodes)
> and corresponding supply names.

Mostly looks good.

> +/**
> + * of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name
> + * @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device
> + * @supply: regulator supply name
> + *
> + * Extract the regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
> + * retruns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
> + * returns NULL.
> + */
> +struct device_node *of_get_regulator(struct device *dev, const char *supply)
> +{

Should be static.

> @@ -1178,6 +1225,10 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id,
> goto found;
> }
> }
> + if (!dev)
> + list_for_each_entry(rdev, &regulator_list, list)
> + if (strcmp(rdev_get_name(rdev), id))
> + goto found;
>

This looks really strange, we didn't remove any old lookup code and the
DT lookup jumps to found by iself so why are we adding code here?

> + if (supply) {
> + struct regulator_dev *r;
> + struct device_node *node;
> +
> + /* first do a dt based lookup */
> + if (dev) {
> + node = of_get_regulator(dev, supply);
> + if (node)
> + list_for_each_entry(r, &regulator_list, list)
> + if (node == r->dev.parent->of_node)
> + goto found;
> }
>
> - if (!found) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to find supply %s\n",
> - init_data->supply_regulator);
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto scrub;
> - }
> + /* next try doing it non-dt way */
> + list_for_each_entry(r, &regulator_list, list)
> + if (strcmp(rdev_get_name(r), supply) == 0)
> + goto found;
>
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to find supply %s\n", supply);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto scrub;
> +
> +found:

This is all getting *really* complicated and illegible. I'm not sure
what the best way to structure is but erroring out early looks useful.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-10 19:37    [W:0.204 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site