lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] tracing: kill wrong message when cat tracing/trace
Because of a local variable is not initialized, I got these
when I did 'cat tracing/trace'. (not trace_pipe):

CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
CPU:0 [LOST 18446612133255294080 EVENTS]
ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffffffff816cfb98 dcache_lock

See peek_next_entry(), it does not set *lost_events when we 'cat tracing/trace'

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 0498beb..b9be232 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ __find_next_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter, int *ent_cpu,
{
struct ring_buffer *buffer = iter->tr->buffer;
struct trace_entry *ent, *next = NULL;
- unsigned long lost_events, next_lost = 0;
+ unsigned long lost_events = 0, next_lost = 0;
int cpu_file = iter->cpu_file;
u64 next_ts = 0, ts;
int next_cpu = -1;


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-05 11:13    [W:0.131 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site