Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:58:16 -0700 | From | Stephen Hemminger <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] e100: expose broadcast_disabled as a module option |
| |
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:22:22 -0700 Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:14, Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I've been facing a very noisy network where hundreds broadcast packets > > were generated every second. > > When this traffic can't be controlled at the source, there is a side > > effect on some systems. > > I was having some idle systems that will never be targeted by this > > broadcast traffic that got loaded just by receiving that "flood". > > I mean by loaded that this light hardware was generating 300 > > context/switches per second. > > > > I was looking for many options to avoid this traffic to disturb this > > hosts and I discovered that the e100 driver was featuring a > > "broadcast_disabled" configure option. > > I realize that this option is not controllable, so I wrote this simple > > patch that expose this option as a module option. > > This allow me to tell this hosts not to listen anymore this traffic. > > > > The result is clearly good as my systems are now running at 21 > > context/switches while being idle. > > Hope this patch isn't too bad and could help others that faces the same problem. > > > > Patch can be downloaded here : > > http://konilope.linuxeries.org/e100_broadcast_disabled.patch > > > > Even if gmail is eating the inlined, patch, at least that make it > > easier to read it for humans. > > If the patch is acked, the downloaded one will be more clean ;) > > > > This patch was generated on top of the latest 2.6 torvald's git. > > Cheers, > > Erwan > > > > Signed-off-by: Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@gmail.com> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c > > index b997e57..2ba582f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/e100.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/e100.c > > @@ -194,12 +194,15 @@ MODULE_FIRMWARE(FIRMWARE_D102E); > > static int debug = 3; > > static int eeprom_bad_csum_allow = 0; > > static int use_io = 0; > > +static int broadcast_disabled = 0; > > module_param(debug, int, 0); > > module_param(eeprom_bad_csum_allow, int, 0); > > module_param(use_io, int, 0); > > +module_param(broadcast_disabled, int, 0); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0=none,...,16=all)"); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(eeprom_bad_csum_allow, "Allow bad eeprom checksums"); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_io, "Force use of i/o access mode"); > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(broadcast_disabled, "Filter broadcast packets > > (0=disabled (default), 1=enabled)"); > > #define DPRINTK(nlevel, klevel, fmt, args...) \ > > (void)((NETIF_MSG_##nlevel & nic->msg_enable) && \ > > printk(KERN_##klevel PFX "%s: %s: " fmt, nic->netdev->name, \ > > @@ -1131,6 +1134,8 @@ static void e100_configure(struct nic *nic, > > struct cb *cb, struct sk_buff *skb) > > config->promiscuous_mode = 0x1; /* 1=on, 0=off */ > > } > > > > + config->broadcast_disabled = broadcast_disabled; /* Broadcast filtering */ > > + > > if (nic->flags & multicast_all) > > config->multicast_all = 0x1; /* 1=accept, 0=no */ > > -- > > Adding Netdev... >
What is wrong with using existing IFF_BROADCAST flag?
-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |