Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | dlm: Fix comment in dlm.h regarding lock_dlm() return values | From | Steven Whitehouse <> | Date | Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:21:41 +0000 |
| |
The code in dlm_lock() explicitly tests for a return value of -EAGAIN and changes it to zero in that case, so this function can never return -EAGAIN. I'm not 100% sure that it can return -ENOTCONN either, but the code paths are more tricky to trace in that case, so I've left that one for now.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/dlm.h b/include/linux/dlm.h index d4e02f5..3b4236c 100644 --- a/include/linux/dlm.h +++ b/include/linux/dlm.h @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ int dlm_release_lockspace(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, int force); * Returns: * 0 if request is successfully queued for processing * -EINVAL if any input parameters are invalid - * -EAGAIN if request would block and is flagged DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE * -ENOMEM if there is no memory to process request * -ENOTCONN if there is a communication error *
| |