lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Sensor event related attribute naming.
Date
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hemanth V" <hemanthv@ti.com>
To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@cam.ac.uk>; "Dmitry Torokhov" <dtor@mail.ru>


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Sensor event related attribute naming.
>
>
>> Given the lack of further comment, I went ahead and implemented the above
>> naming
>> scheme for IIO. As the above discussion with Hemanth shows, there are
>> some corner cases
>> that will need futher thought in the future.
>>
>
> Jonathan, haven't seen many comments on this. Do u think the reason
> might be that these interfaces are hidden behind a HAL layer like in
> android and
> might not be a burning issue for many people.
>

Dmitry, could you let us know your thoughts on this too.
Would using a HAL layer be better compared to creating a standard
sysfs interface, as it seems to be the popular approach.

Thanks
Hemanth



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-12 11:09    [W:0.027 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site