Messages in this thread | | | From | "Hemanth V" <> | Subject | Re: Sensor event related attribute naming. | Date | Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:34:36 +0530 |
| |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hemanth V" <hemanthv@ti.com> To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@cam.ac.uk>; "Dmitry Torokhov" <dtor@mail.ru>
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@cam.ac.uk> > To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@cam.ac.uk> > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:36 PM > Subject: Re: Sensor event related attribute naming. > > >> Given the lack of further comment, I went ahead and implemented the above >> naming >> scheme for IIO. As the above discussion with Hemanth shows, there are >> some corner cases >> that will need futher thought in the future. >> > > Jonathan, haven't seen many comments on this. Do u think the reason > might be that these interfaces are hidden behind a HAL layer like in > android and > might not be a burning issue for many people. >
Dmitry, could you let us know your thoughts on this too. Would using a HAL layer be better compared to creating a standard sysfs interface, as it seems to be the popular approach.
Thanks Hemanth
| |