| Date | Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:40:39 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements |
| |
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:38:36 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
> On 09/06/2009 11:59 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >[...] > > Also, i'd like to outline that i agree with the general goals > > described by you in the BFS announcement - small desktop systems > > matter more than large systems. We find it critically important > > that the mainline Linux scheduler performs well on those systems > > too - and if you (or anyone else) can reproduce suboptimal behavior > > please let the scheduler folks know so that we can fix/improve it. > > BFS improved behavior of many applications on my Intel Core 2 box in > a way that can't be benchmarked. Examples:
Have you tried to see if latencytop catches such latencies ?
|