| Date | Mon, 7 Sep 2009 13:57:51 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements |
| |
On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > Scheduler Runtime Max lat Avg lat Std dev > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > CFS 100 951 462 267 > CFS-x2 100 983 484 308 > BFS > BFS-x2
Those numbers are buggy, btw, it's not nearly as bad. But responsiveness under compile load IS bad though, the test app just didn't quantify it correctly. I'll see if I can get it working properly.
-- Jens Axboe
|