Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl | Date | Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:55:34 +0100 |
| |
On Friday 18 December 2009 02:04:37 pm Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > I like this patch, this is actually what I wanted to do. > > > > > > I have nothing against a switch, but it had better default to off. > > > > > > The whole 80-char limit is insane. It results in insane "fixes". Just > > > about every time somebody "improves" a patch due to the warning, the > > > result is worse than the original patch. > > > > Examples? :) > > balance_leaf() in fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c > > Example picked totally at random: > > set_le_ih_k_offset(ih, > le_ih_k_offset(ih) + > (tb-> > lbytes << > (is_indirect_le_ih > (ih) ? tb->tb_sb-> > s_blocksize_bits - > UNFM_P_SHIFT : > 0))); > > See how everything is nicely aligned to 80 cols?
I see but the above code is an utter crap anyway.
Firstly what kind of a function parameter is that:
le_ih_k_offset(ih) + (tb->lbytes << (is_indirect_le_ih(ih) ? tb->tb_sb->s_blocksize_bits - UNFM_P_SHIFT : 0))
?
[ BTW 'tb->tb_sb->s_blocksize_bits - UNFM_P_SHIFT' construct is used five times in balance_leaf() and is a likely candidate for helper / macro. ]
More importantly the whole balance_leaf() function is almost 1400 LOC (!) big and impossible to read: code for handling particular 'switch' blocks should be factored out into separate functions etc.
The point I was making is that the once we remove the limit we don't have other tool to _automatically_ point suspicious code areas (yes, I would also prefer intelligent static code checker over dumb limit but it simply not here as things are today and dumb limit works surprisingly well most of the time -- please note how that the structural problem with the code example given is immediately visible with the current limit).
> Generally, don't look at this function after having a good lunch you want > to keep. You have been warned.
No worries, I visit dark places (ide, staging, ..) and come back alive.. ;)
-- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
| |