Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus pristine tree) | Date | Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:38:10 +0200 |
| |
On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote: > > > I just had another incident where it disassociated and refused to > > > reassociate. I got about 100 of these in my dmesg (fixed by unloading > > > and reloading ath9k): > > > > Is this a regression from 2.6.26? > > > > ath9k has been recently introduced (i.e. it's new to 2.6.27). So I'm not > certain how to answer. Correct me if I'm wrong but a regression is a new > bug for a specific component that did not surface in the previous release, > correct?
Yes.
> But if the component didn't exist in the previous version, is it still a > regression?
No, it isn't considered as a regression.
Thanks, Rafael
| |