Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:07:28 -0700 (PDT) | From | Steven Noonan <> | Subject | Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus pristine tree) |
| |
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote: > > I just had another incident where it disassociated and refused to > > reassociate. I got about 100 of these in my dmesg (fixed by unloading > > and reloading ath9k): > > Is this a regression from 2.6.26? >
ath9k has been recently introduced (i.e. it's new to 2.6.27). So I'm not certain how to answer. Correct me if I'm wrong but a regression is a new bug for a specific component that did not surface in the previous release, correct? But if the component didn't exist in the previous version, is it still a regression?
- Steven
| |