lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.
From
Date
Hi Linus,

> > David W has made it very clear that the eventual intent of this patch series
> > is to remove all firmware from the kernel tree and have it shipped as a
> > seperate package.
>
> I don't think that kind of black-and-white model is necessarily
> attainable. Nor do I think it's even _good_.
>
> It's probably the right thign for _some_ firmware, assuming we have models
> that just make it easy enough - for drivers where it's generally better
> for distros to get the firmware from vendors rather than the kernel.
>
> But there is certainly nothing inherently good in forcing a split.
>
> I think both sides here need to calm down and stop being so extreme.
>
> I do want request_firmware() to be the way to load firmware (and possibly
> other configuration data too, for that matter - I don't think it's
> necessarily wrong for people to "misuse" it for other long-term data
> despite the name), and I do want people to be able to update firmware
> easily without having to force a kernel bump, but I also don't think it
> means that firmware has to go away from the kernel sources.

actually the PCMCIA subsystem is already using request_firmware() to
load external CIS data to overwrite broken ones.

Regards

Marcel




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-15 21:25    [W:0.382 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site