Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325 | Date | Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:00:27 +0200 |
| |
On Friday, 27 of June 2008, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Well, actually, I'm not sure that will work. I have only found > > acpi_skip_timer_override being set to 1 in two places, but it doesn't seem to > > be read anywhere. What am I missing? > > I believe I removed all the occurences. I am waiting for a proposal of a > quirk based on the DSDT ID -- my time is a bit too limited to study the > internals of our ACPI code at the moment; sorry about that. I will > complement it with a change to remove IRQ0 from I/O APIC tables as > promised then; this piece of code I am quite familiar with.
Well, why don't we use the DMI identification as suggested by Matthew?
I think we can safely assume that all of these boxes are broken for now and we can use a more fine grained identification in the future, if necessary.
Thanks, Rafael
| |