Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:37:17 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: architectures with ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT but no binfmt_aout |
| |
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:29:09PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 14:23 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Sorting these alphabetically will result in less merge conflicts when > > the list grows. > > Maybe, but it doesn't grow that fast -- and it's small enough that if I > add stuff in the middle, the context will cover the whole thing and > cause a merge conflict either way. And it isn't in alphabetical order > now either :) I know and I know. If someone did the janitorial effort and converted all the per-arch defined symbols to one single definiton and select the list would grow rapidly.
Sam
| |