Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 May 2008 14:59:23 +0300 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches |
| |
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:52:34AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > I would really appreciate it if you could send the error message and > > the .config but not quick kconfig patches that are often wrong and > > that you try to push through the maintainers as you tried here. > > hey, sorry about invading your turf of trivial patches ;) I dont see it > as a problem that the thought process and the initial patch is > incomplete and ad-hoc. My preference is to work with people out in the > open, even on trivial issues. Dmitry is a capable maintainer who > understands his code very well and he'll resist me if i'm full of it. > Just like i resisted you when you were full of it. That's what > maintainers do, their job is to know their code. > > And, occasionally, as in this case, i might end up being faced with a > bug in the code i maintain ;)
You completely miss my point.
You wrongly (and loudly) blamed Dmitry for something you broke yourself.
And if I hadn't stopped you pointing to what actually was broken you might have annoyed Dmitry until he'd have merged your wrong patch.
I don't claim any knowledge about scheduler or x86 internals, but I claim that I might be the person with the second-best understanding of our kconfig files.
And I'd really prefer being able to take some time searching for a correct solution over having to quickly defeat the mess you create as I had here.
> Ingo
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
| |