Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:24:36 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: Using sparse to catch invalid RCU dereferences? |
| |
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 06:09:15PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > So the address_space attribute says what the pointer points to rather > > than where the pointer resides, correct? > > Yeah. It's currently used for __user and __iomem. Using it for rcu > wouldn't be quite the way it was intended, I think, but hey :)
;-)
> > It might be. There are a number of places where it is legal to access > > RCU-protected pointers directly, and all of these would need to be > > changed. For example, in the example above, one could do: > > > > foo = NULL; > > Yeah, all of those would lead to sparse warnings. Are we willing to > change all that code?
If it found some bugs, I would certainly be in favor!
> > I recently tried to modify rcu_assign_pointer() to issue the memory > > memory barrier only when the pointer was non-NULL, but this ended badly. > > Probably because I am not the greatest gcc expert around... We ended > > up having to define an rcu_assign_index() to handle the possibility of > > assigning a zero-value array index, but my attempts to do type-checking > > backfired, and I eventually gave it up. Again, someone a bit more clued > > in to gcc than I am could probably pull it off. > > I don't think I would be that person :)
When it comes to gcc extensions and type-casting trickery, I am not all that clued in, to be honest...
> > In addition, it is legal to omit rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer() > > when holding the update-side lock. > > Right. Those too would lead to problems, unless we change that code to > use those (or other) macros.
Yep.
> > So I very much like this approach in general, but it will require some > > care to implement. I would be very happy to review and comment!!! > > I'll play with it a bit if I get around, was just reviewing some RCU > usage and had the feeling that it should be possible to automate.
If it finds a few bugs, it would be worth it!
Thanx, Paul
| |