On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll > relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one
I'm checking 2.6.24 now. A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa showed no real change.