Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:32:39 +0100 (BST) | From | Hugh Dickins <> | Subject | Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23 |
| |
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ross Biro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh > <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll > > relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one > > I'm checking 2.6.24 now. A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa > showed no real change.
Worth checking 2.6.24, yes. But you've already made it clear that you do NOT have mem cgroups in your 2.6.25-rc9, so Balbir (probably) need not worry about your regression: my guess was wrong on that.
Hugh
| |