Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:30:48 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: Announce: Semaphore-Removal tree |
| |
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:22:31PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > If you can make a case for converting some semaphores to spinlocks be my > guest .. If you have good reasoning I wouldn't stand in the way.. (Real > time converts all the spinlocks to mutexes anyway ..)
Right at hand I have the XFS inode hash lock was converted from a rw_semaphore to a rwlock_t becuase the context switch overhead was killing performance in various benchmarks. This is a very typical scenary for locks that are taken often and held for a rather short time. Add to that fact that a spinlock is compltely optimized away for an UP kernel while a mutex is not and the amount of memory that any mutex takes compared to a spinlock you have a clear winner.
| |