Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:50:47 -0400 | From | Andres Salomon <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-mm1 |
| |
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:38:33 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:25:44 -0400 Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:29:25 -0700 > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:10:24 -0400 Joseph Fannin <jfannin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:47:57AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: [...] > > > > > > which we probably just shouldn't do this at all unless we're running on the > > > OLPC hardware. But we need to do this to find out if we're running on the OLPC > > > hardware! Perhaps the warning should just be removed. > > > > Hm. We could either protect that code with an: > > > > if (!is_geode()) > > return; > > > > Or I could add the OpenFirmware patches which would allow us to get > > rid of this code, and instead check for the existence of OFW using > > that. > > > > The former is quick and easy; the latter is (imo) nicer, so long as > > people don't have problems w/ the OFW code. :) > > > > Do both ;) > > The quick-n-easy version sounds suitable for now.
Heh, I already had sent the nicer version. If people have some fundamental problem w/ it, I can send the quick-n-easy version.
-- Need a kernel or Debian developer? Contact me, I'm looking for contracts.
| |