lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.25-mm1
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:38:33 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:25:44 -0400 Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:29:25 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:10:24 -0400 Joseph Fannin <jfannin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:47:57AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > which we probably just shouldn't do this at all unless we're running on the
> > > OLPC hardware. But we need to do this to find out if we're running on the OLPC
> > > hardware! Perhaps the warning should just be removed.
> >
> > Hm. We could either protect that code with an:
> >
> > if (!is_geode())
> > return;
> >
> > Or I could add the OpenFirmware patches which would allow us to get
> > rid of this code, and instead check for the existence of OFW using
> > that.
> >
> > The former is quick and easy; the latter is (imo) nicer, so long as
> > people don't have problems w/ the OFW code. :)
> >
>
> Do both ;)
>
> The quick-n-easy version sounds suitable for now.

Heh, I already had sent the nicer version. If people have some fundamental
problem w/ it, I can send the quick-n-easy version.


--
Need a kernel or Debian developer? Contact me, I'm looking for contracts.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-19 19:51    [W:0.160 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site