Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:23:51 +0300 | From | Artem Bityutskiy <> | Subject | Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) |
| |
Andi Kleen wrote: > Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru> writes: > >> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >>> For me, the motivators to wait for LogFS are mainly the facts that it >>> can work on traditional block devices, and not only on pure flash: >> Sorry Thomasz, for me this makes zero sense. There are _much_ better file >> systems for block devices. > > I think he refers to flash disks appearing as block devices, like > usb sticks or similar.
Right, I also meant that in my opinion it makes more sense to use traditional file-systems like ext3 on USB-key/MMC and the like stuff (which I confusingly referred as "block devices"), or may be something more "heavy-weight" like XFS or JFS (never tried them, though).
-- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |