Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:09:35 +0300 | From | Artem Bityutskiy <> | Subject | Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) |
| |
Jörn Engel wrote: > About a year ago I would have used roughly the same argument. But in > the meanwhile I have accepted the fact that any piece of flash I'll use > in a notebook in the next five years will likely use SATA or USB as a > transport medium.
Well, Thomasz was talking not about the transport I believe. If you have a raw flash access via SATA or USB, then this is handled on the driver level and does not any require FS support. JFFS2 or UBIFS may also work with such a device, because it is just raw flash. But I know that you know that most of the FTL-enabled stuff does not give use raw flash access.
-- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |