Messages in this thread | | | Subject | [Pull] Some documentation patches | From | Jonathan Corbet <> | Date | Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:20:12 -0600 |
| |
I've noticed that getting documentation patches merged seems to be a slower and more uncertain process than it was a while back. So I figured I'd try to be one of the cool folks with their own git tree and see if that works better. Linus, if you agree, could you please pull:
git://git.lwn.net/linux-2.6.git docs
To get the following:
Jonathan Corbet (3): Add the seq_file documentation Fill out information on patch tags in SubmittingPatches Add a comment discouraging use of in_atomic()
Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 54 ++++++- Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX | 2 + Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt | 283 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/hardirq.h | 8 + 4 files changed, 344 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt
These changes are (1) an updated version of the seq_file document first posted in 2003, (2) the much-reviewed patch tags documentation, and (3) a comment warning developers that in_atomic() doesn't mean what they think it means. No code changes.
If this works out, and nobody objects, I'll try to run this tree into the future as a collection point for documentation patches which don't have a more obvious tree to travel through.
Thanks,
jon
| |