Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:09:44 -0500 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | allocation failure in b43/ssb |
| |
We just had a report from a user who spotted a bunch of messages of the form below in his logs..
swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020 Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686.debug #1 [<c064a320>] ? printk+0xf/0x17 [<c0472da5>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x3c0/0x3db [<c0472dd7>] __alloc_pages+0xa/0xc [<c048bbab>] __slab_alloc+0x1aa/0x4ea [<c048c74d>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x98/0xf9 [<eec655c2>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x3d/0x1cf [b43] [<eec655c2>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x3d/0x1cf [b43] [<c05d5280>] __alloc_skb+0x49/0xf8 [<eec655c2>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x3d/0x1cf [b43] [<eeb9d783>] ? ssb_pci_read32+0x29/0x31 [ssb] [<eec65a2e>] b43_dma_rx+0x28b/0x3f1 [b43] [<eec59a83>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x58f/0x6e4 [b43] [<c042eb92>] ? tasklet_action+0x40/0xec [<c042ebd1>] tasklet_action+0x7f/0xec [<c042f502>] __do_softirq+0x84/0x10a [<c0406f6e>] do_softirq+0x79/0xda [<c04685ed>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0xb6 [<c042f068>] irq_exit+0x44/0x77 [<c04070b3>] do_IRQ+0xe4/0xfd [<c040567a>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34 [<c04400d8>] ? pm_qos_add_requirement+0x39/0x93 [<c05524e9>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x19e/0x20e [<c05520c2>] acpi_idle_enter_bm+0xbc/0x345 [<c043fe82>] ? pm_qos_requirement+0x26/0x2b [<c05beb2a>] ? menu_select+0x38/0x86 [<c05bdea1>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x67/0x97 [<c05bde3a>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0x97 [<c0403bfc>] cpu_idle+0xb8/0xd8 [<c063ce6e>] rest_init+0x4e/0x50 ======================= Mem-info: DMA per-cpu: CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 Normal per-cpu: CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 125 Active:127308 inactive:26735 dirty:8411 writeback:340 unstable:0 free:1213 slab:15322 mapped:13069 pagetables:1563 bounce:0 DMA free:2864kB min:72kB low:88kB high:108kB active:2784kB inactive:1552kB present:16160kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 709 709 709 Normal free:1988kB min:3368kB low:4208kB high:5052kB active:506448kB inactive:105388kB present:726060kB pages_scanned:1460 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 DMA: 34*4kB 1*8kB 8*16kB 11*32kB 9*64kB 3*128kB 1*256kB 2*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2864kB Normal: 341*4kB 2*8kB 20*16kB 1*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1988kB 78549 total pagecache pages Swap cache: add 352198, delete 308691, find 91428/128877 Free swap = 1065960kB Total swap = 1502068kB 188128 pages of RAM 0 pages of HIGHMEM 4850 reserved pages 100808 pages shared 43507 pages swap cached 8411 pages dirty 340 pages writeback 13069 pages mapped 15322 pages slab 1563 pages pagetables
The kernel is a little old (2.6.26).
Looking at it though, I'm puzzled..
It seems we failed to allocate an order-1 allocation, even though we had memory available in the DMA and normal zones.
What am I missing?
Full logs at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322882
Dave
-- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| |