Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:55:11 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 2.6-git |
| |
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:10:32PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >>>>> There is a difference in the musb patch I submitted and the one which >>>>> actually has been >>>>> forwarded to you by Felipe. This difference has introduced a bug. > >>>>> The patch in you series is, >>>>> usb: musb: fix BULK request on different available endpoints > >>>>> It was submitted by me at, >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122337227617797&w=2 > >>>>> And the one which is forwarded to you by Felipe is at, >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122528597316728&w=2 > >>>>> There is a difference in between above two as below. >>>>> Original: + if (best_end < 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) { >>>>> Sent to you: + if (best_end > 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) >>>>> { > >>>>> It should be [best_end < 0]. > >>>>> If it is possible then please correct this mismatch in your series. > >>>> I'll wait to get a patch from Felipe for this. > >>> I'm seeing it being to you sent at least a week ago -- look for "usb: >>> musb: fix bug in musb_schedule". > >> As Felipe is the maintainer of the musb code, and has been batching up >> patches and sending them on to me when needed, I have only been taking >> them from him. > >> So that message is long deleted from my mail, sorry. > > Even though it was a message from him CCing you? :-) > Here it is: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122605639520312.
Nope, I'm not on the CC: for that message, sorry, check your headers...
thanks,
greg k-h
| |