Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:59:48 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 2.6-git |
| |
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:40:48PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Greg KH wrote: > >>> Hi Greg, > >>> There is a difference in the musb patch I submitted and the one which >>> actually has been >>> forwarded to you by Felipe. This difference has introduced a bug. > >>> The patch in you series is, >>> usb: musb: fix BULK request on different available endpoints > >>> It was submitted by me at, >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122337227617797&w=2 > >>> And the one which is forwarded to you by Felipe is at, >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122528597316728&w=2 > >>> There is a difference in between above two as below. >>> Original: + if (best_end < 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) { >>> Sent to you: + if (best_end > 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) { > >>> It should be [best_end < 0]. > >>> If it is possible then please correct this mismatch in your series. > >> I'll wait to get a patch from Felipe for this. > > I'm seeing it being to you sent at least a week ago -- look for "usb: > musb: fix bug in musb_schedule".
As Felipe is the maintainer of the musb code, and has been batching up patches and sending them on to me when needed, I have only been taking them from him.
So that message is long deleted from my mail, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |